Skip to main content

How to Address the Debate on “Whether Cloud Saves IT/Business Cost” Practically and Strategically


Context
This is a simple question, but it is hard to provide a simple answer. It has been asked by all companies plan to initiate their cloud practices.
There are various cloud cost models on the market, including those from AWS, Azure, Gartner , etc. However, none of them can provide a simple answer to the question. The only practical right answer is: depends.
It is said that one of large cloud providers hired a PhD in finance from Harvard. All s/he does is to figure out, make and tell a financial case/story for the company’s potential enterprise customers.

Debate on “Whether Cloud Saves IT/Business Cost”
When I led enterprise cloud practice initiations during consulting engagements with large companies, the debate on "whether cloud will save IT and business cost" was always on the table. Quite often the debate was about comparing “apple” with “orange”. The various stakeholders were never able to achieve an “agreement”.
A typical dilemma is: some cloud-promoters may argue that cloud will enable IT only pay for what they need without large investment upfront. However, some IT leaders from infrastructure or data center team may argue that the company already invested $20M on servers. We can provide what IT/business needs for “free” by utilizing those servers, but it will cost “more” if you use “cloud”. Hence, “apple” and “orange” continue to debate and never be able to really convince each other.
The current common practical technique to address the debate is:
·         In long term, cloud is the right directional way to go.
·         In short term, cloud may cost more.
Then, “apple” side and “orange” side both feel “happy” to move the initial cloud practice development forward. However, the debate will continue but the focus will switch to how to split the strategic and tactic IT investment budget on “cloud” and “local data center”. It becomes a typical “budget discussion”.
Although it is practical, it only aligns the various stakeholders together in short term. It is lack of clear and strategic agreement on cloud practice, which is essential for a company’s success in digital era.

Solution to Address the Debate Practically and Strategically
In fact, “whether cloud saves IT/Business cost” is really a “wrong” (or misleading) question, although it is a common-sense question in IT and business.  The right question should be:  Whether cloud makes IT or business more efficient and effective?
In business (including IT), the real challenge is never about “cost”. It is more about, given the investment (cost), how much more value (profit) the business will gain. If IT cost more but it creates much more value to business, the “cost” is not an issue. The “cost” becomes right valuable “investment” for business. Hence, it is more about whether IT can become more efficient and effective with cloud per business needs, less about whether IT with cloud will cost more or less this year than last year.
Therefore, the question “whether cloud saves IT/Business cost” should be changed to “whether cloud makes IT/business more efficient and effective”. Then the answer is a simple: YES. Although IT with cloud may have higher budget/cost than previous year. IT with cloud will create more values to business with less waste and debt. Cloud creates strategic and tactic values for business in a more efficient and effective manner.
·         Efficiency:
o   Cloud enables a company only pay for what business needs through trading capital expense for variable expense
o   Benefit from massive economies of scale
o   Stop guessing IT capacity
o   Stop spending money on running and maintaining data centers
·         Effectiveness
o   Increase enterprise productivity, speed and agility
o   Go global in minutes or hours
·         Innovation
o   Cloud enables a company to quickly gain new digital capabilities (e.g. AI/Machine Learning, Big Data) which are critical for a company’s success in digital era.
o   Faster digital innovate/transform
§  Approaching new digital techniques /capability quicker from cloud
§  Freedom to try and fail with manageable minimum cost until success

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Second or Fast Second the Best Strategy for Big Established Companies?

Background   - Second or Fast Second Many large companies prefer to take “second strategy” to get the most of the market value the “first mover” may create without taking the risk the “first mover” may have. They hope to enter the emerging market secondly but utilizing its know-how in the existing industry to become one of the leaders in the new market. Will “second strategy” works? It really depends on whether a large company has the capability and time to execute effectively to enter a new market as a second mover but become one of the leader in the new market quickly. Given the fact that quite some large leading companies taking “second strategy” failed to become a leader in a new market they pursued and some of them even failed to survive, e.g. Blockbuster, Barnes & Noble, Kodak, etc. the “fast second strategy” is proposed as the best strategy for big, established companies contemplating entry into an emerging market (by Constantinos C. Markides and Paul A. Geroski,

What is Enterprise Architecture Practice

Introduction There are many definitions of Enterprise Architecture (EA) on the market. Different people have different understandings about it. When I presented Enterprise Architecture and Business Innovation & Transformation in an international conference of The Open Group, I asked the audience: how many of you think you know the definition of Enterprise Architecture. There are about 90% of them raised hands. Then I asked: how many of you think you and your colleagues’ share a same understanding of Enterprise Architecture, there are about 40-50% of them raised hands. When I asked: how many of you think you and your managers share a same understanding of Enterprise Architecture, only about 10-20% of people raised hands. Then I asked: how many of you think you and your companies’ executives share a same understanding of Enterprise Architecture, only few people raised hands, about 1-2%. Generally, companies have some key players in their enterprise architecture practices(EAP), suc